![Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/364/bmj.l344/F2.large.jpg)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ
![British Journal Of Midwifery - Improving induction of labour for women through the development of a new pathway British Journal Of Midwifery - Improving induction of labour for women through the development of a new pathway](https://www.britishjournalofmidwifery.com/media/tqbnqr2o/bjom-2018-26-9-585_f02.jpg)
British Journal Of Midwifery - Improving induction of labour for women through the development of a new pathway
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and social care directorate Quality standards and indicators Briefing p
Notts.Obs.Docs 💙 on Twitter: "1/4 Rates of induction of labour have risen @NottmMaternity too, in line with the national trend. We have developed a series of infographics to help women decide if
![Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial - The Lancet Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial - The Lancet](https://www.thelancet.com/cms/attachment/23b9854d-80ad-4736-99f3-6401416ffa57/gr1_lrg.gif)
Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial - The Lancet
![Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/364/bmj.l344/F1.medium.jpg)