![Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies - ScienceDirect Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies - ScienceDirect](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0002937819304259-gr1.jpg)
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies - ScienceDirect
VBAC Facts - Can we count all the ways induction at home is problematic? And quoting the ARRIVE trial as fact to back it? Repost Tracy Donegan, “Another disturbing example of a
![Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/364/bmj.l344/F3.medium.jpg)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ
![Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks? The ARRIVE Trial Reviewed & Its Impact on Your Labor & Birth! - YouTube Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks? The ARRIVE Trial Reviewed & Its Impact on Your Labor & Birth! - YouTube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TJe54uZXI9Y/maxresdefault.jpg)
Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks? The ARRIVE Trial Reviewed & Its Impact on Your Labor & Birth! - YouTube
![Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial | The BMJ Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/367/bmj.l6131/F1.large.jpg)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial | The BMJ
![The ARRIVE Study: Does induction of labor for women at 39 weeks gestation lower the cesarean section rate? The ARRIVE Study: Does induction of labor for women at 39 weeks gestation lower the cesarean section rate?](https://birthandbabiesbydesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/labor-count-down.jpeg)
The ARRIVE Study: Does induction of labor for women at 39 weeks gestation lower the cesarean section rate?
![Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/364/bmj.l344/F1.medium.jpg)